Ekaterine Gorgodze vs Carolyn Ansari Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 30 May at 09:56 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Gorgodze vs C. Ansari

GEO
1
Win
Played
0
Win

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gorgodze 1 - 0 Ansari
They have played 3 sets in total, with Ekaterine Gorgodze winning 2 and Carolyn Ansari winning 1. The last match between Ekaterine Gorgodze and Carolyn Ansari was at the W50 Otocec, 30-05-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Ekaterine Gorgodze getting the victory 6-1 3-6 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Gorgodze | 1 |
| Ansari | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) W50 Otocec(05-30-25)
E. Gorgodze vs C. Ansari H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $346,247 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 57.16% (591-443) | Career Total W/L | 63.69% (107-61) |
| 1 | Clay | 0 |
| 19 | Titles | 2 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
E. Gorgodze vs C. Ansari Match Preview:
- In recent second serve performance, Gorgodze won 39.07% of points, slightly less than Ansari's 39.63%. Could this minor difference influence the match outcome? Perhaps, considering its correlation to match prediction accuracy.
- When examining return games, Gorgodze captured 51.12% of opponents' second serve points compared to Ansari's 52.09%. For first serve returns, Gorgodze secured a 39.28% success rate, outperforming Ansari's 34.3%. Does this give Gorgodze a notable edge in returning serves? It likely does.
- Under pressure, Gorgodze saved 45.79% of breakpoints, slightly behind Ansari's 46.13%. Does this indicate higher resilience for Ansari during crucial plays? Marginally.
- Over the past year, Gorgodze won 63.16% of matches with a 48/28 record, while Ansari achieved 68.85% with a 42/19 record. Does this tip the scales towards Ansari overall? It does suggest Ansari's better form.
- On clay, both players thrive, with Gorgodze holding a 62% win rate and Ansari, 70%. This could favor Ansari marginally on this surface, considering both prefer clay.
- Gorgodze frequently competes in Challengers/ITF tournaments and has a 64% win rate, compared to Ansari's 74.42% in Futures/Satellites/ITF events. Could the difference in competition level play a role? Yes, Gorgodze regularly faces tougher opponents.
- Gorgodze's opponents have an average rank of 392.07, while Ansari has competed against players averaging a rank of 445.59. Does this imply Gorgodze is more accustomed to facing challenging opponents? It might contribute to their experience edge.
- When a match goes to a deciding set, Gorgodze has a 48% win rate versus Ansari's impressive 65%. Does Ansari seem more reliable in play-off situations? Indeed, a crucial advantage.
- Regarding break point conversion, Gorgodze converts 44.32% of opportunities while Ansari achieves 38.61%. Could this influence critical game turning points? Very likely, favoring Gorgodze slightly.
Editorial Prediction (May 30, 2025, UTC):
Examining recent performance-related stats, Ansari demonstrates marginally better second serve and pressure performance, which can be pivotal in deciding close matches. Yet, Gorgodze's strengths in break point conversion and superior return game statistics suggest a more robust game against difficult serves.
Looking at surface proficiency, both players excel on clay, with Ansari showing a slightly higher win rate, although Gorgodze is no stranger to facing high-caliber opponents, which may provide valuable match experience.
In deciding sets, Ansari appears significantly more reliable, potentially tipping scales should the match extend to this stage. However, Gorgodze's track record against tougher opponents compensates for Ansari's accomplishments on lower-tier circuits.
Predicting the match outcome based on these insights, while closely contested, Gorgodze’s consistency against higher-ranked opposition and critical match performance might make them more likely to emerge victorious in this anticipated clash.
Ekaterine Gorgodze vs Carolyn Ansari Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Gorgodze vs C. Ansari H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 11 |
| 0 | Aces (Total) | 1 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 2:16:41 | Average Match Time | 2:16:41 |
| 79% (70/89) | 1st Serve % | 77% (72/93) |
| 63% (44/70) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (41/72) |
| 42% (8/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 48% (10/21) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 27% (3/11) |
| 45% (42/93) | Return Points Win % | 42% (37/89) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Gorgodze Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-0 6-3 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-3 | ||
R1 | L | 7-6(5) 6-3 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||
R1 | W | 6-3 6-1 | ||
C. Ansari Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R1 | L | 6-2 6-3 | ||
QF | L | 6-1 6-3 | ||
R2 | W | 4-6 6-4 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 3-6 6-0 | ||
R1 | L | 6-3 5-7 6-2 | ||

E. Gorgodze vs C. Ansari Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 57.16% (591/443) | YTD Win/Loss | 63.69% (107/61) |
| 56.95% (1364/1031) | Sets Win/Loss | 61.74% (234/145) |
| 53.36% (11472/10026) | Games Win/Loss | 54.95% (1899/1557) |
| 52.48% (106/96) | Hard Win/Loss | 65.44% (89/47) |
| 61.06% (461/294) | Clay Win/Loss | 66.67% (16/8) |
| 30.56% (22/50) | Indoor Hard W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.05 | Aces Per Game | 0.07 |
| 551 | Aces Total | 124 |
| 0.1 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.41 |
| 1043 | Total Double Faults | 699 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:30:2 |
| 532.27 | Average Opponent Rank | 449.59 |
| 74% (29706/39979) | 1st Serve % | 65% (6273/9622) |
| 57% (16994/29706) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (3856/6273) |
| 46% (4739/10273) | 2nd Serve Win % | 44% (1488/3349) |
| 50% (2743/5519) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 49% (644/1322) |
| 48% (19531/40607) | Return Points Win % | 48% (4648/9691) |
| 37.04% (10/17) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (2/3) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 36.84% (7/12) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 34.21% (13/25) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 53.76% (336/289) | Challenger W/L | 56.47% (48/37) |
| 69.69% (223/97) | Futures W/L | 71.08% (59/24) |
| 57% (581/1018) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 63% (105/166) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 47% (88/187) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 59% (16/27) |
| 44% (150/341) | Deciding Set Win % | 51% (23/45) |
| 81% (641/521) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 90% (105/95) |
| 18% (641/118) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 10% (105/10) |
| 18% (393/69) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 19% (63/12) |